top of page

2026 Colorado Election

Gena Ozols'

2026 Ballot Guide

View Gena’s recommendation for each measure and

select “Gena’s Reasoning” for more information.

Screenshot 2026-02-07 at 6.20.47 PM.png

OFFICIAL VOTER GUIDE • HOUSE DISTRICT 3

Your Voice. A stronger Colorado

= Gena's recommendation.

AMEDMENT

81

Law Enforcment Reporting Requirements

Changes to reporting requirements for law enforcement interactions.

Yes

No

This amendment would force local law enforcement to coordinate with ICE, turning officers who should be focused on community safety into an extension of the federal administration’s cruel and xenophobic immigration agenda. When families fear that any interaction with local authorities could put them or their loved ones at risk, everyone is less safe and lacks the confidence to report dangerous crimes. Colorado should be building trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve, not weaponizing local officers to help carry out federal immigration policies that tear families and communities apart.

Designated Representative:

Michael Fields c/o West Group

Suzanne Taheri c/o West Group

Favor:

A Brighter Colorado

Registered Agent: Steven Ward

 

Eagle County Republican Women Club

Registered Agent: Christina Adams

Oppose: 

Colorado Communities First

Registered Agent: Henry Sandman

 

The People’s No

Registered Agent: Dusti Gurule

 

Vote Common Sense

Registered Agent: Ashley Stevens

AMEDMENT

82

Right to Natural Gas

Creates a constitutional right for consumers to access and use natural gas.

Yes

No

I believe we need a balanced approach to Colorado’s energy needs, and consumers should be able to use natural gas if they choose or if it is what their community’s infrastructure supports. However, enshrining access to a specific product or industry in our state constitution sets a dangerous and unnecessary precedent.

I am also deeply concerned that this amendment is being led by Advance Colorado, a right-wing organization with a history of using ballot measures to advance a broader political agenda. Given both the substance of the proposal and the organization behind it, I cannot support this amendment. You can read more about Advance Colorado here and why their involvement raises additional concerns for me.

Designated Representative:

Steven Ward Advance Colorado, Michael Fields Advance Colorado

Favor:

A Brighter Colorado

Registered Agent: Steven Ward

Oppose: 

No Pollution in the Constitution

Registered Agent: Nikki Riedt

 

Vote Common Sense

Registered Agent: Ashley Stevens

AMEDMENT

83

 Constitutional Right to Hunt and Fish

Adds the right to hunt and fish to the Colorado Constitution.

Yes

No

The Constitution should be reserved for protecting our most fundamental rights and values. While I recognize the cultural and economic importance of hunting and fishing in Colorado, I do not believe they require constitutional protection. This amendment is an unnecessary attempt to lock vague, special-interest language into our state’s highest law, potentially undermining decades of carefully developed wildlife protections and limiting Colorado’s ability to responsibly manage wildlife in the future.

Designated Representative:

Steven Ward c/o West Group, Suzanne Taheri c/o West Group

Favor:

Let’s Go Colorado

Registered Agent: Gwen Benevento

T. Roosevelt Conservation Alliance

Registered Agent: Jon Anderson

Oppose: 

Protect Colorado’s Constitution

Registered Agent: Clinton Talbot

 

Stop the Constitutional Power Grab

Registered Agent: Matt Bergles

 

Colorado Hunters and Anglers for Sensible Wildlife Conservation

Registered Agent: Eric Lee Washburn

AMEDMENT

Mail Ballot Voter Identification

84

Adds voter-identification requirements for voting by mail in Colorado.

Yes

No

This amendment creates unnecessary voting barriers, does not make elections more secure and is designed to disenfranchise voters and suppress turnout. The state of Colorado is already a gold standard of election security and accessibility and there is absolutely no evidence to the contrary. This measure is nothing more than an attempt to cater to false rhetoric and the federal attacks on our elections.

Designated Representative:

Chuck Broerman West Group, Suzanne Taheri West Group

Favor:

Colorado Voter Trust Initiative

Registered Agent: Suzanne Taheri

Oppose: 

Defend our Ballots Issue Committee

Registered Agent: Richard Pelletier

AMEDMENT

85

Plain Language Ballot Questions

Establishes new plain-language requirements for the wording of ballot questions.

Yes

No

Ironically, this amendment leaves language too vague and could strip away essential details of the ballot measures that may lead voters to be less informed. Most good policy and good explanations cannot be boiled down to soundbites, (see this ballot guide) and voters deserve full and thorough information on the proposals on their ballot.  

 

Similarly to other measures, I am also deeply concerned that this amendment is being led by Advance Colorado, a right-wing organization with a history of using ballot measures to advance a broader political agenda. Given both the substance of the proposal and the organization behind it, I cannot support this amendment. 

Designated Representative:

Suzanne Taheri Advance Colorado

Michael Fields Advance Colorado

Favor:

A Brighter Colorado

Registered Agent: Steven Ward

Oppose: 

N/A

AMEDMENT

Congressional Redistricting

86

Yes

No

Changes the rules governing when Colorado’s congressional districts may be redrawn.

Colorado already has an independent redistricting process designed to draw congressional districts following each U.S. Census while limiting partisan influence. This amendment would circumvent that established process and open the door to politically motivated redistricting between census cycles, threatening fair representation and creating new opportunities for partisan gerrymandering.

Similarly to other measures, I am also deeply concerned that this amendment is being led by Advance Colorado, a right-wing organization with a history of using ballot measures to advance a broader political agenda. Given both the substance of the proposal and the organization behind it, I cannot support this amendment.

Designated Representative:

Suzanne Taheri Advance Colorado

Elizabeth Caven Advance Colorado

Favor:

Fair Redistricting Colorado

Registered Agent: Steven Ward

 

A Brighter Colorado

Registered Agent: Steven Ward

Oppose: 

N/A

AMEDMENT

87

Graduated Income Tax

Replaces Colorado’s flat income tax with graduated tax rates based on income.

Yes

No

This amendment would create a graduated income tax in the state of Colorado. This will create a tax cut for 97% of Colorado taxpayers including seniors, veterans, and most small businesses and local restaurants while those that make $500,000 or more will pay their fair share of taxes in order to lock in investments to schools, childcare, healthcare, and communities across the state.

Read more about this ballot measure here

Designated Representative:

Chris deGruy Kennedy

Kiyana Newell

Favor:

Protect Colorado’s Future Coalition

Registered Agent: Chris deGruy Kennedy

 

Yes for Colorado Kids

Registered Agent: Ashley Stevens

Oppose: 

Americans For Prosperity Colorado Issue Committee

Registered Agent: Margee Clancy

 

Your Family's Future Alliance

Registered Agent: Geoff Sakala

 

Keep Colorado Affordable

Registered Agent: Steve Ward

 

A Brighter Colorado

Registered Agent: Steven Ward

 

Affordable Colorado

Registered Agent: Katie Kennedy

 

Let’s Go Colorado

Registered Agent: Gwen Benevento

 

Don’t Price Us Out

Registered Agent: Katie Kennedy

PROPOSITION

NN

Public Education Funding

Increases Colorado’s investment in K–12 public education each year for the next ten years.

Yes

No

This proposition would ensure Colorado increases its investment in K-12 public education by two percent each year for the next ten years, without raising taxes. Those investments would help increase teacher pay and retention, reduce class sizes, and expand access to career and technical education. The measure was thoughtfully developed by leading state budget experts alongside education advocates, creating a responsible approach to strengthening Colorado’s public schools and investing in our students, educators, and communities.

Designated Representative:

N/A

Favor:

Yes for Colorado Kids

Registered Agent: Ashley Stevens

Oppose: 

A Brighter Colorado

Registered Agent: Steven Ward

 

Affordable Colorado

Registered Agent: Katie Kennedy

 

Let’s Go Colorado

Registered Agent: Gwen Benevento

 

Keep Colorado Affordable

Registered Agent: Steve Ward

 

Don’t Price Us Out

Registered Agent: Katie Kennedy

PROPOSITION

Penalties for Fentanyl Crimes 

132

Increases criminal penalties for certain fentanyl-related offenses.

Yes

No

Prop 132 is a private prison cash grab masquerading as a solution to the opioid crisis. It would create new criminals out of people struggling with addiction and even people who unknowingly purchase drugs laced with fentanyl, while doing nothing meaningful to prevent addiction, expand treatment, or stop fentanyl from entering our communities. Instead, Colorado taxpayers would be on the hook for at least $433 million to incarcerate more people, separate more families, and fill more prison beds. We cannot incarcerate our way out of addiction, and we certainly should not make prison corporations richer trying. 

Read more from our partners here.  

Designated Representative:

Suzanne Taheri c/o West Group Michael Fields c/o West Group

Favor:

A Brighter Colorado

Registered Agent: Steven Ward

 

Eagle County Republican Women Club

Registered Agent: Christina Adams

Oppose: 

The People’s No

Registered Agent: Dusti Gurule

 

Coloradans For Real Safety Solutions

Registered Agent: Ashley Stevens

 

Vote Common Sense

Registered Agent: Ashley Stevens

PROPOSITION

Penalties for Human Trafficking of a Minor

133

Increases sentencing requirements for crimes involving the human trafficking of a minor.

Yes

No

Human trafficking of children is an unspeakably vile and evil crime. Those who exploit children should face severe consequences, and do so under state and federal law. This proposition exploits justified outrage as well as survivors’ trauma, to mandate life sentences and expand incarceration while limiting judicial discretion. If we are serious about fighting trafficking, we should invest in preventing exploitation, supporting survivors, and prosecuting traffickers, not by exploiting a horrific crime to sell more prison beds.

Designated Representative: Erin Lee and Michelle Austin

Favor:

Protect Kids Colorado – Issue Committee

Registered Agent: Patricia McKernan

 

Protect Our Children

Registered Agent: Michele Austin

Oppose: 

Vote Common Sense

Registered Agent: Ashley Stevens

PROPOSITION

Male and Female Participation in School Sports

134

Yes

No

Establishes sex-based eligibility requirements for participation in school sports.

Every kid deserves a fair shot to play, and I trust coaches and athletic experts, not politicians, to set fair rules for school sports. This measure is so vague that it could subject any girl to an invasive “gender check” simply because someone thinks she is too tall, too strong, or doesn't look the way they think a girl should. That's not protecting girls. We should protect the safety, privacy, and dignity of all students.

Designated Representative:

Erin Lee and Michelle Austin

Favor:

Protect Kids Colorado – Issue Committee

Registered Agent: Patricia McKernan

 

Protect Our Children

Registered Agent: Michele Austin

Oppose: 

The People’s No

Registered Agent: Dusti Gurule

 

Families not Politics

Registered Agent: Jason Story

 

No on 134 and 135

Registered Agent: Craig Skinner

 

Protect Trans Kids

Registered Agent: Z Williams

 

Vote Common Sense

Registered Agent: Ashley Stevens

PROPOSITION

Prohibit Certain Surgeries on Minors

135

Yes

No

Prohibits certain surgical procedures from being performed on minors.

Medical decisions for children belong with families and trusted doctors, not politicians. This measure is written so broadly that it could interfere with medically necessary care that has nothing to do with being transgender, including routine procedures for conditions like an undescended testicle. Families and doctors already make these decisions carefully together. The government should not take those decisions away from them or put children's healthcare at risk.

Designated Representative:

Erin Lee and Michelle Austin

Favor:

Protect Kids Colorado – Issue Committee

Registered Agent: Patricia McKernan

 

Protect Our Children

Registered Agent: Michele Austin

Oppose: 

The People’s No

Registered Agent: Dusti Gurule

 

Families not Politics

Registered Agent: Jason Story

 

No on 134 and 135

Registered Agent: Craig Skinner

 

Protect Trans Kids

Registered Agent: Z Williams

 

Vote Common Sense

Registered Agent: Ashley Stevens

PROPOSITION

Income Tax Cap

136

Yes

No

Establishes a cap affecting Colorado’s income tax rates and future tax policy.

I strongly support businesses that invest in Colorado, create good jobs, and take seriously their responsibility to the communities that help them succeed. That includes contributing to the schools, infrastructure, healthcare, and public services that businesses and their workers rely on. Proposition 136 would instead lock a major corporate tax break into law, allowing powerful corporations to avoid contributing their fair share. Good businesses are good neighbors, and good neighbors understand that being part of a thriving community means investing in it, not finding new ways to avoid the bill.

Similarly to other measures, I am also deeply concerned that this amendment is being led by Advance Colorado, a right-wing organization with a history of using ballot measures to advance a broader political agenda. Given both the substance of the proposal and the organization behind it, I cannot support this amendment. You can read more about Advance Colorado here and why their involvement raises additional concerns for me.

Designated Representative:

Suzanne Taheri Advance Colorado

Michael Fields Advance Colorado

Favor:

A Brighter Colorado

Registered Agent: Steven Ward

 

Keep Colorado Affordable

Registered Agent: Steve Ward

Oppose: 

N/A

PROPOSITION

Designate Sporting Goods Sales Tax Revenue for Conservation

137

Yes

No

Dedicates existing sporting-goods sales tax revenue to conservation and outdoor protection.

Proposition 137 does not create a new tax. It dedicates roughly $175 million annually from existing sporting goods sales tax revenue to conservation, wildfire prevention, water protection, and outdoor access.

But there is a real tradeoff: permanently earmarking this revenue and exempting it from TABOR could reduce future refunds or limit funding available for priorities like education and healthcare. I am generally cautious about ballot-box budgeting for exactly that reason.

However, Colorado faces growing wildfire, water, and conservation needs that require long-term investment. On balance, I believe protecting our land, water, and communities is worth that commitment.

Designated Representative:

Brendan Witt c/o Tierney Lawrence Stiles LLC 

Aaron Citron c/o Tierney Lawrence Stiles LLC

Favor:

Protect Colorado’s Land 

Water, Prevent Wildfires

Registered Agent: Tarn Udall

Oppose: 

Protect Colorado's Land, Communities, and Tax Dollars

Registered Agent: Josh Schlossberg

BALLOT ISSUE

7A

Front Range Passenger Rail District

Creates a 0.333% sales tax to build and operate a larger Front Range passenger rail system.

Yes

No

7A would create a 0.333% sales tax to build out and operate a larger Front Range passenger rail system. Colorado keeps growing, I-25 congestion isn't going away, and we have spent decades building communities around the assumption that virtually every trip requires a car. Passenger rail creates another option for accessing jobs, education, and communities across the Front Range.

 

I am generally not a fan of sales taxes because they disproportionately burden working families, and voters are being asked to establish a permanent revenue stream before we know exactly how the full system will perform. But major infrastructure requires long-term investment, and Colorado cannot solve congestion by simply adding more cars and highway lanes.

Designated Representative:

N/A

Favor:

Coloradans for CoCo

Registered Agent: Rachel Gordon

Oppose: 

N/A

Screenshot 2026-02-07 at 6.20.47 PM.png

I want to hear from you

Email: OzolsForHd3@gmail.com 
Phone: ‪(720) 739-0985‬

PO Box 1878

Englewood, CO 80110

Stay Updated

Connect

  • Instagram
  • Facebook

Paid for by Gena for HD3: Agent Emily Mahoney

bottom of page